What do you think? Anybody is up to try to solve this once for all? Perhaps this could be the key to implement some option in ROOT that produces the same. I wonder what is pdflatex doing to produce a better output than root itself.įerhue showed by means of inkscape that the xml-code is different in both cases. tex and then compile from there to pdf, which makes the task kind of arduous to do it systematically for all the plots.īesides (from his example two posts away), it seems that his trick does not respect the label fonts. The Ferhue user seems to have managed to get rid of this problem, but his workaround implies that one has to convert to. When I say ugly I mean not that nice and smooth like the scalable graphics. png output, the white lines are gone, but I get ugly rendering for the lines, markers and text labels. Given the popularity of the OS X, I really think that it would be very worthy to try to get rid of this problem. They like the plots, but they find funny these lines. I am preparing a long article which is full of colored 2D histograms and they look very nice apart from this fact.Įvery colleague of mine tells me about these white lines.

This is a very important issue to me because it is the only remaining thing to feel satisfied with the outlook of ROOT’s plots. Which is producing the bad rendering with white lines among the bins.

It is mac Preview (in all its forms, i.e., the web plugin, the printer output, etc.)

How to use inkscape .tex output